Showing posts with label LHypothesise. Show all posts
Showing posts with label LHypothesise. Show all posts

Thursday, 6 June 2024

Integration in Action

Recently, I was fortunate to visit one of our Sommerville satellite classes based at Sylvia Park School to witness an integrated Math and Literacy lesson. The students were being taught the concept of time by reading The Hungry Caterpillar while making connections to the days of the week within the story. 

Upon entering the classroom, there was a familiar hum of activity as the students were transitioning to their seats ready for the learning block to commence. What struck me at first glance was the purposeful seating arrangement of the students around a U-shaped table in front of a smartboard with the classroom teacher (CT) positioned at the heart of the learning station. It was evident this CT had pre-planned and intentionally set up resources for this integrated session. It was well-organised and equipped with a plethora of learning tools e.g. AAC systems laid out for each child, large print visuals to supplement the story, Numicon set on display and learning assistants strategically seated alongside a couple of students requiring more adult support. It was clear that differentiated resources were prepared well in advance to ensure each child would access the session at their level. Also, it's important to note that this CT had ensure to conduct a pre-chat with the learning assistants to outline the type of support required in the upcoming session. Clearly, a well oiled team who understands their learners well. 

This immediately signaled the importance classroom organisation plays to ensure a successful learning block, and how pivotal its is to scaffold learners with appropriate tools to access as well as comprehend what is being taught. 

Throughout the session, the learning environment was abuzz with chatter, each learner supported at their level to meet their individualised learning goal i.e. point to the correct day of the week and the food item eaten (on the fringe vocabulary of the coreboard) to identify what the caterpillar ate on that given day. The concept of time was reinforced with core words to build comprehension of the story e.g. "big" "eat" "more" "next" "when" to indicate the caterpillar getting bigger and fatter the more it ate. Some learners where identifying words on their high tech devices where others were learning to correctly use NZSL sign for the days of the week and accompanying core words. 

Seeing every student engaged in their learning was delightful, albeit in their own ways.

Types of engagement I observed throughout the session:

  • Feedback from staff was given to celebrate when students were successful in i.e. high five; verbal praise of "well done" or "that's correct"

  • Constant praise on readiness for learning i.e. good sitting/looking.

  • Students copying modelled NZSL signing of words.

  • Allocation of sensory movement breaks so that one child had freedom to move and then return to the table to continue learning.

  • One student was seated and bouncing on the physio ball while learning and getting the movement they needed to stay focused.

  • Assigned staff well aware of their designated learners needs and provided scaffolded AAC support.

  • PB4L tokens distributed for learners ability to follow routines pre, during and post session.

  • Calm and enthusiastic staff who could redirect students where/when required.

  • Other activities running in the classroom TAs celebrated learners in their different groups.


Thursday, 2 May 2024

Confidence Levels of Colleagues in Sommerville School

What the survey data showed:

Out of the 17 responses gained, it was really interesting to see how colleagues rated their confidence level to deliver their classroom program using an integrated approach.
(Scale: 1 = not confident and 10 = very confident) 

Forms response chart. Question title: How confident do you feel to merge and teach curriculum areas? 
e.g. Maths & Dance

Teaching position & orientation (left, right, backwards, forwards, turn) through a dance sequence. . Number of responses: 17 responses.

  • 7 out of 17 ( 41.2%) staff members rated themselves at 8 or higher. (Highly confident)
  • 8 out of 17 ( 47.2%) staff members rated themselves between 5 - 7. (Middle level confidence)
  • 2 out of 17 ( 11.8%) staff members rated themselves below 5. (Low confidence)
It appears the confidence levels are high in the majority of our cohort, but I was intrigued to also delve deeper into the challenges faced by teachers to deliver their classroom program with an integrated approach. The findings [pie chart below] suggested that the main barriers colleagues faced was a) Time to collaborate and b) lack of resource availability. 

Forms response chart. Question title: What are some of the limitations/barriers you find in planning with an integrated approach?. Number of responses: 17 responses.

This had me wondering...what are some actionable steps that can be taken to overcome these barriers when a) teachers are feeling time constraints to connect with each other to plan collaboratively and b) limited curriculum resources available for their utilisation? Sommerville has a wonderful wealth of expertise that exists across the school network, so how can we intentionally connect these teachers as valuable resources themselves to plan using an integrated curriculum approach.

My wonderings for potential ways forward:
- Deliberately using termly "Team Release" days to plan collaboratively in our pathway teams.
- Using release days to visit expert teachers across the wider school network who have a strong expertise in a specific area of the curriculum, so that we take advantage of these expertise within our school.
- Connecting with our Curriculum Leaders to explore how their different areas can be taught in a way that allows planning to be merged effectively for our student outcomes.
- Reaching out to other Specialist school in Auckland and across NZ to see how they deliver the curriculum in their school settings.